今天的年终总结表彰大会事实上就是百姓实业发展有限公司的一次盛大阅兵式---展示大家的工作成果，展望充满机遇与挑战的未来。在这里，我要真诚地向各位厂家合作伙伴，向各位为公司勤勉服务的所有员工致以深深的敬意。作为公司的总经理，我亲眼目睹了公司在一年来的巨大变化，并从内心深处为公司的快速发展而骄傲。在这一年中，广大干部和员工时刻以公司的兴衰为己任，忘我工作的精神让我感动，我相信，百姓大药房在大家的共同努力下，一定会有一个美好的未来。

众所周知，百姓大药房作为外来企业入驻惠州不到两年半，却受到了惠州市民广泛的认可及好评。200x年对于百姓来说，是一个发展及壮大的一年。在全体员工的共同努力下，百姓实业有限公司取得了飞速的发展，特别是百姓大药房，4月份下角店开业，不到六个月的时间便顺利通过gsp的认证。随着业务的不断的拓展，于12月份百姓大药房第六家分店龙津店的顺利开业。这累累战果得益于全体员工的不懈努力、各部门的协力配合及各厂家合作伙伴的支持。这此要特别表扬的是我们的李副总和人事部罗经理，更要感谢各位厂家。正是有了你们的帮忙及配合，百姓大药房才能在竞争如此激烈的市场环境下生存并不断发展。我也坚信百姓实业有限公司在200x年会迈上一个更高的台阶，让我们为了明年取得更好的成绩而鼓掌(全体鼓掌)。

新的一年意味着新的起点、新的机遇、新的挑战。随着大参林、北京同仁堂的进驻，对我们来说，有一定的压力与影响，但只要我们把细节做好，服务做细，秉承“一切为了百姓，服务于百姓”的经营宗旨和理念，以顾客需求为中心，同时严格把好药品质量这一关，让所有顾客买到放心、省心、安心的药品，在保证药品平价的同时注重药品质量，只有将这软、硬件同时提高，我们才可以在药行“丛林”中生存与发展。

展望200x年，百姓实业发展有限公司将迈上一个更高的台阶，走多元化发展道路，为了实现更高的目标，我们在06年的工作重心大概有三个方面：

一、深化服务，提高服务质量

平价只是一个前提，让顾客真正受益还是高质量的服务。所以要求每一个一线工作人员的综合素质在新的一年加强与提高，以饱满的热情与微笑面对每一个来百姓的顾客。

二、严把质量关，保证药品质量

药品是一种特殊的食品，关系到每一个消费者的健康问题，故质量是保证与提前。我们要把关好是在采购、验货、入库、出仓、进店等每一个环节，保证顾客买到放心的药品。

三、加强团队建设

随着百姓的不断壮大，拥有一支团结、勇于创新的团队是为其发展的保障，所以加强团队建设也是06年我们工作的重心。

百姓的发展离不开每一个员工，我衷心地希望大家都能跟着企业一起发展。在此，我向在坐的各位说声：你们辛苦了!今晚我们在一起吃团圆饭，也祝愿各位在新的一年工作顺心，身体健康。谢谢!

演讲稿的格式范文篇2

老师们，同学们，大家早上好!

今天我演讲的题目是《诚信考试》

诚信是中华民族的传统美德，更是做人的基本准则。而考试，作为较好的相对公平的测试评价形式，一直广泛应用于各级学校。为什么要考试?首先，测试你对学科知识的掌握程度;其次，测试你的学习技巧和记忆程度，最重要的事测试你的诚信。

古人云：“人而无信，不知其可。”诚实守信应是每个学习者所应该遵守的准则，然而在我们同学之中肆意杜撰、移花接木成为原本纯洁神圣的学术殿堂中某些同学的看家本领。即使学校总强调诚信考试，还总能查处几个作弊学生。而作弊，不仅是对我们自己能力的否定蔑视，更是对我校良好校风的亵渎。作弊者不仅丢掉了诚信，更丢掉了尊严。

跨进三中大门，莘莘学子的心里都明白这三年我们最终的目标是取得高考的胜利。每天的早出晚归，成篇的作业，父母的唠叨，老师的期望无时无刻都在提醒着我们目标在那里。一次次的考试，一次次的检验可以让我们看清自己的欠缺知识，即使弥补不足，使自己的学习更加进步。同时，考试也是在培养我们独立思考的能力，提高我们的自信心。考试考砸了，下次可以努力，但品行上如果沾上了污点，又怎能轻轻拭去。那些因为考试受了处分的同学，他们心中一定充满着后悔与愧疚。所以，同学们，为了不失掉一次考察自己的机会，为了不后悔自己的行为，让我们共同自觉遵守考试纪律，诚信考试。

诚信是绽放于人类之树的一朵鲜花，它把我们的世界变得更和谐、更美好。让我们携手拒绝考试作弊，拒绝不讲诚信等不良习气，树优良学风，做诚信学子。

我的演讲到此结束，谢谢大家。

演讲稿的格式范文篇3

尊敬的老师，敬爱的同学们：

大家好!今天我要演讲的题目是：夸夸身边的榜样。

每天的新闻播报中都有各种各样的光荣事例，可我们总觉得这些榜样人物离得太远，总没有办法抓住他们的身影。其实，仔细留意生活，你会从身边人的身上感受到那一丝丝榜样的气息，从身边的事中看到电视中那一件件伟大的缩影。他们，那些人，那些事，实际上一直存在于我们的身边。榜样就在我们的身旁。

身边的榜样是一叶扁舟，虽是粗木所制，仍能带我到达彼岸;身边的榜样是一盏烛灯，虽不能与皓月相比，但可照亮人生的道路;身边的榜样是小小指南针，虽不如卫星如此发达，依旧为我指引前进的方向。

我们班有许许多多值得大家学习的好榜样。比如：书写潇洒漂亮的刘佳雯，英语杀手李海峰。我最佩服的是吴昕怡同学，她不仅学习成绩优秀，而且书写端正漂亮。每个老师都很喜欢她，同学们很佩服她。她学习成绩优异，参加过许多校级比赛。还获得了许多奖。她上网不是玩游戏，而是积累知识与材料，她有一个博客，里面有许多她自己写的好文章，有老师布置的，也有自己写的随笔、诗歌、感想等等。我羡慕她的一手好字，更羡慕她这样才华横溢。还有朗读能力也很棒，声音响亮，感情丰富，把作者要表达的都从读中体现得淋漓尽致，那会让你情不自禁地举起大拇指。无论在什么课上，她都是专心致志、兴致勃勃的，老师讲课时，她坐得端端正正，听得津津有味，好像老实说的不是话，而是动听的音乐，目光追随着老师，眼睛里充满了求知的渴望，她把全部的精力都集中在与老师的互动中，在她眼里，上课时只有老师的讲解和自己领悟，忘记了同桌，忘记了周围的一切。吴昕怡是我们的好榜样，这样的好榜样还有许许多多，只要你留心就会发现，同学们，赶快行动起来，学习你身边的好榜样，这样你就会天天向上!

身边的榜样，默默无闻，不似名人大张旗鼓，但依然能如阳似火，温暖我们的心头，他们是我们积极向上、奋力拼搏的催化剂，传递与我们不朽的精神，让我们将其转化为学习的动力，为自己铸造一身钢皮铁骨，在将来铺满荆棘的道路上披荆斩棘，勇往直前，成为祖国真正迎风而舞的花朵，为创造祖国辉煌未来贡献自己的力量。

我的演讲完毕，谢谢大家!

演讲稿的格式范文篇4

同学们：

大家好！

我演讲的题目是《国歌，最强劲的旋律》。

每当我们面对冉冉升起的国旗，听着庄严、激昂的国歌时，我们的心头无形中就会产生一股催人奋进的力量，热血沸腾。因为这旋律是我们整个民族的心声。

在二十世纪初，日本侵略者就虎视耽耽地把目光瞄准了中国这块肥沃的土地，妄图把整个中国划人他们的版图。1931年，日本帝国主义发动了九一八事变，侵占了我国东北三剩第二年，又在上海挑起战火。1933年，日本帝国主义者的铁蹄又踏过长城，侵占了热河、察北和冀东

在这民族危亡的关键时刻，不愿当亡国奴的中国人民发出了极其悲壮的吼声：起来，不愿做奴隶的人们，把我们的血肉筑成我们新的长城1935 年，进步作家田汉代表每一个中国人写成了《义勇军进行曲》的歌词，青年音乐家聂耳以巨大的革命热情为这首歌谱了曲。他们把对祖国和人民的热爱、对日本帝国主义侵略者的满腔仇恨以及全国人民要求一致抗战的呼声，都融人这首歌中。

这首凝聚着中华民族精魂、呐喊和意志的歌曲，在中华民族最危险的时刻像火山爆发喷涌而出。这歌声，唤醒了所有不愿做奴隶的人们，这歌声，激励着多少中华儿女前仆后继，筑起抵抗日本侵略军的血肉长城，终于取得了反侵略战争的伟大胜利；这歌声，鼓舞人民从胜利走向胜利，推翻了国民党反动派的黑暗统治，建立起人民当家做主的新中国。

1949年，中国人民政治协商会议第一届全体会议决定：在中华人民共和国国歌未正式制定前，以《义勇军进行曲》为国歌。1982年，第五届全国人民代表大会第五次会议正式决定：《义勇军进行曲》为中华人民共和国国歌。

这雄壮的国歌声，伴随着中国人民建设祖国的步伐，响彻神州大地。在这歌声中，鲜艳的五星红旗升上了天空，中国人民站起来了，中华人民共和国成立了；在这歌声中，中国人民摘掉了东亚病夫的帽子，中国成了体育强国；在这歌声中，原子弹爆炸成功，火箭、卫星升上天空；在这歌声中，香港顺利回归，百年耻辱，一朝得以洗清

今天，这庄严而高亢的旋律仍将鼓舞着中华儿女为祖国和民族的繁荣发展，万众一心，奋勇前进；激励我们从小好好学习科学文化知识，长大后，为祖国作出自己的贡献。

演讲稿的格式范文篇5

各位老师、各位同学：

大家好！我今天国旗下演讲的题目是《爱自己，给心灵一片阳光》。

心理学家告诉我们：人的健康一半是身体健康，一半是心理健康。然而在日常生活中，人们常常重视身体健康，而忽视心理健康。心理健康是一个动态的发展的过程，按照心理健康的标准，我们可以看出心理绝对健康的人应该是没有的，今天的你可能非常有安全感、幸福感，明天的你可能就会遇到让你很不安全的烦心事……所以要使自己的心理更多地处于健康状态，我们就需要关注自己的心理健康，关爱自己。

爱自己，首先是要悦纳自己。

心理学家指出，在人们的心理活动中，自信或自卑的自我评价有很大的不同。自信的人经常会把自己看作是有价值的、能干的人；自卑的人恰恰相反。人们的许多痛苦，往往来自于不接纳自己。

据调查发现，现代中小学生中有15.3％的同学不满意自己的相貌、体形；38.7％的同学不满意自己的学习状况；15.9％的同学不满意自己的健康；15.8％的同学不满意自己的性格……

被称为“阳光小子”的日本青年乙武阳匡，他天生没有四肢，但他上了日本大学----早稻田大学，并成了电视台的主播，他在自传《五体不满足》中叙述了他如何在电动轮椅上求学和童年所动的许多手术等等，他激励了许多日本民众，书的销量达380万本。20xx年他幸福地走进婚姻的殿堂，妻子是他大学学妹。他在接受记者采访时说：我很满足！

悦纳自己，简而言之就是：不以物喜，不以己悲，不怨天尤人，从容、坦然地面对一切。

爱自己，还要关注自己的情绪，及时处理自己的不良情绪。

在我们平时的学习、工作、生活中，莫名的惆怅和迷惘，难耐的焦虑、压抑和孤独？因为考试失败的伤心；因为老师的批评而委屈；因为同学的误解而难过……这些都是我们每个人都有可能遇到的消极情绪，中考、大考临近，学习压力导致的情绪问题是我们同学最普遍也是最影响学习效率的问题。所以关注自己的情绪，学会及时处理自己的不良情绪就显得很重要。

爱自己，还需要常说谢谢。当我们经常说谢谢的时候，这不仅给别人一种彬彬有礼的感觉更会给自己一些积极的心理暗示：你看，有那么多人为我服务，那么多人关心我，那么多人帮助我，那么多人给我提供方便……同时，当我们向别人说谢谢的时候，对方会有被尊重、被肯定的感觉，这种感觉是积极人际交往的催化剂。当我们对父母说谢谢的时候，我们懂得了父母的工作的艰辛；当我们对老师说谢谢的时候，我们明白了老师的一片苦心；当我们对同学说谢谢的时候，我们记住了同学的帮助与关爱……当我们常说谢谢的时候，我们就等于把生活中很多的“理所当然”变为了“我真幸福”……

爱自己，就从现在开始给自己的心灵注入微笑、乐观、自信、坚强、乐于助人、宽待别人的阳光，做一个主宰命运、享受生活的健康人！各位同学，从今天开始，请敞开你心灵的大门，把自己的困惑、困难向你的老师、父母、同学倾诉，我们都很愿意为你排忧解难，我们都希望看到你的阳光笑脸，让我们一起努力吧。谢谢大家。

演讲稿的格式范文篇6

thank you, mr. chairman.

mr. chairman, i join my colleague mr. rangel in thanking you for giving the junior members of this committee the glorious opportunity of sharing the pain of this inquiry. mr. chairman, you are a strong man, and it has not been easy but we have tried as best we can to give you as much assistance as possible.

earlier today, we heard the beginning of the preamble to the constitution of the united states: "we, the people." it's a very eloquent beginning. but when that document was completed on the seventeenth of september in 1787, i was not included in that "we, the people." i felt somehow for many years that george washington and alexander hamilton just left me out by mistake. but through the process of amendment, interpretation, and court decision, i have finally been included in "we, the people."

today i am an inquisitor. an hyperbole would not be fictional and would not overstate the solemnness that i feel right now. my faith in the constitution is whole; it is complete; it is total. and i am not going to sit here and be an idle spectator to the diminution, the subversion, the destruction, of the constitution.

"who can so properly be the inquisitors for the nation as the representatives of the nation themselves?" "the subjects of its jurisdiction are those offenses which proceed from the misconduct of public men."¹ and that's what we're talking about. in other words, [the jurisdiction comes] from the abuse or violation of some public trust.

it is wrong, i suggest, it is a misreading of the constitution for any member here to assert that for a member to vote for an article of impeachment means that that member must be convinced that the president should be removed from office. the constitution doesn't say that. the powers relating to impeachment are an essential check in the hands of the body of the legislature against and upon the encroachments of the executive. the division between the two branches of the legislature, the house and the senate, assigning to the one the right to accuse and to the other the right to judge, the framers of this constitution were very astute. they did not make the accusers and the judgers -- and the judges the same person.

we know the nature of impeachment. we've been talking about it awhile now. it is chiefly designed for the president and his high ministers to somehow be called into account. it is designed to "bridle" the executive if he engages in excesses. "it is designed as a method of national inquest into the conduct of public men."² the framers confided in the congress the power if need be, to remove the president in order to strike a delicate balance between a president swollen with power and grown tyrannical, and preservation of the independence of the executive.

the nature of impeachment: a narrowly channeled exception to the separation-of-powers maxim. the federal convention of 1787 said that. it limited impeachment to high crimes and misdemeanors and discounted and opposed the term "maladministration." "it is to be used only for great misdemeanors," so it was said in the north carolina ratification convention. and in the virginia ratification convention: "we do not trust our liberty to a particular branch. we need one branch to check the other."

"no one need be afraid" -- the north carolina ratification convention -- "no one need be afraid that officers who commit oppression will pass with immunity." "prosecutions of impeachments will seldom fail to agitate the passions of the whole community," said hamilton in the federalist papers, number 65. "we divide into parties more or less friendly or inimical to the accused."³ i do not mean political parties in that sense.

the drawing of political lines goes to the motivation behind impeachment; but impeachment must proceed within the confines of the constitutional term "high crime[s] and misdemeanors." of the impeachment process, it was woodrow wilson who said that "nothing short of the grossest offenses against the plain law of the land will suffice to give them speed and effectiveness. indignation so great as to overgrow party interest may secure a conviction; but nothing else can."

common sense would be revolted if we engaged upon this process for petty reasons. congress has a lot to do: appropriations, tax reform, health insurance, campaign finance reform, housing, environmental protection, energy sufficiency, mass transportation. pettiness cannot be allowed to stand in the face of such overwhelming problems. so today we are not being petty. we are trying to be big, because the task we have before us is a big one.

this morning, in a discussion of the evidence, we were told that the evidence which purports to support the allegations of misuse of the cia by the president is thin. we're told that that evidence is insufficient. what that recital of the evidence this morning did not include is what the president did know on june the 23rd, 1972.

the president did know that it was republican money, that it was money from the committee for the re-election of the president, which was found in the possession of one of the burglars arrested on june the 17th. what the president did know on the 23rd of june was the prior activities of e. howard hunt, which included his participation in the break-in of daniel ellsberg's psychiatrist, which included howard hunt's participation in the dita beard itt affair, which included howard hunt's fabrication of cables designed to discredit the kennedy administration.

we were further cautioned today that perhaps these proceedings ought to be delayed because certainly there would be new evidence forthcoming from the president of the united states. there has not even been an obfuscated indication that this committee would receive any additional materials from the president. the committee subpoena is outstanding, and if the president wants to supply that material, the committee sits here. the fact is that on yesterday, the american people waited with great anxiety for eight hours, not knowing whether their president would obey an order of the supreme court of the united states.

at this point, i would like to juxtapose a few of the impeachment criteria with some of the actions the president has engaged in. impeachment criteria: james madison, from the virginia ratification convention. "if the president be connected in any suspicious manner with any person and there be grounds to believe that he will shelter him, he may be impeached."

we have heard time and time again that the evidence reflects the payment to defendants money. the president had knowledge that these funds were being paid and these were funds collected for the 1972 presidential campaign. we know that the president met with mr. henry petersen 27 times to discuss matters related to watergate, and immediately thereafter met with the very persons who were implicated in the information mr. petersen was receiving. the words are: "if the president is connected in any suspicious manner with any person and there be grounds to believe that he will shelter that person, he may be impeached."

justice story: "impeachment" is attended -- "is intended for occasional and extraordinary cases where a superior power acting for the whole people is put into operation to protect their rights and rescue their liberties from violations." we know about the huston plan. we know about the break-in of the psychiatrist's office. we know that there was absolute complete direction on september 3rd when the president indicated that a surreptitious entry had been made in dr. fielding's office, after having met with mr. ehrlichman and mr. young. "protect their rights." "rescue their liberties from violation."

the carolina ratification convention impeachment criteria: those are impeachable "who behave amiss or betray their public trust."4 beginning shortly after the watergate break-in and continuing to the present time, the president has engaged in a series of public statements and actions designed to thwart the lawful investigation by government prosecutors. moreover, the president has made public announcements and assertions bearing on the watergate case, which the evidence will show he knew to be false. these assertions, false assertions, impeachable, those who misbehave. those who "behave amiss or betray the public trust."

james madison again at the constitutional convention: "a president is impeachable if he attempts to subvert the constitution." the constitution charges the president with the task of taking care that the laws be faithfully executed, and yet the president has counseled his aides to commit perjury, willfully disregard the secrecy of grand jury proceedings, conceal surreptitious entry, attempt to compromise a federal judge, while publicly displaying his cooperation with the processes of criminal justice. "a president is impeachable if he attempts to subvert the constitution."

if the impeachment provision in the constitution of the united states will not reach the offenses charged here, then perhaps that 18th-century constitution should be abandoned to a 20th-century paper shredder.

has the president committed offenses, and planned, and directed, and acquiesced in a course of conduct which the constitution will not tolerate? that's the question. we know that. we know the question. we should now forthwith proceed to answer the question. it is reason, and not passion, which must guide our deliberations, guide our debate, and guide our decision.

i yield back the balance of my time, mr. chairman.

演讲稿的格式范文最新6篇相关文章：